RTN broadcast picture quality

bhengh's picture
bhengh
Appleton, Wisconsin

About a week ago, I noticed that the picture quality of channel 2-3 is much worse than it used to be. This happened about the same time that the channel started putting their station id "bug" in the lower right corner of the screen. The picture is very grainy, especially when there is a lot of motion on the screen. I don't know a whole lot about digital video, but perhaps there is more compression now than before? Has anyone else noticed anything? Or am I the only one that watches this channel?

It's a shame, because this channel is one of my favorites. I am watching over-the-air.

Posted January 22, 2009 11:59am in
FoxCitiesTV's picture
 #

There was some corporate

There was some corporate shakeups at the channel lately and I believe -- someone correct me if I'm wrong -- that WBAY is running a national feed of the channel now instead of their locally-customized version they had before. Maybe that has something to do with it.

 
Willscary's picture
 #

Yes. RTN was sold. The new

Yes.

RTN was sold. The new owner took over January 1??? or thereabouts. There was a disagreement between the old and new owners and the station went dark for a few days. When it came back, it was a national feed instead of a personalized feed. We still get the national feed today.

It sucks. I much prefer the old RTN.

Bill

 
Tom's picture
 #

Not to hijack.. but I

Not to hijack.. but I noticed the same on FOX last night. Lie To Me seemed super grainy.. especially in the whites, which I had not noticed on FOX before. (Over the air here, btw)

But I also noticed that RTN looked rougher. Wonder if they stole some bandwidth from -2 and -3 to make their primary HD look better...

 
Bradly's picture
 #

Probably some wierd effect

Probably some wierd effect the producer of the program wanted. I've noticed that on some HD movies these days as well as on some tv programs (Battlestar Galactica comes to mind). People spend all this money on High Def sets and then the producers want to blur that definition down with some grain in the video. It makes no sense in my opinion. The question would be if it has the same graininess week to week. That would answer if it's something the producers want, or something else.

 
Tom's picture
 #

True... was the show

True... was the show premiere, so I'll find out this week. But I feel the same.. all this money to get real-life images, then they add blur and grain & make it look like a homemade 8mm video.

Getting back to original topic... RTN looked better to me this weekend. Still soft, but not as much grain & blur.

 

To comment on this story, please log in.  If you don't have an account, sign up for one.  It's free!

Recent Comments

FoxCitiesTV: I'm just glad he's doing actual meteorology again, and not those goofy Oneida Casino ads he did a year or two ago. Good to see him back in the saddle.
on John Chandik joins WFRV... temporarily
Thursday, June 6 @ 12:59 pm
TvBoy: From what most people say, Journal doesn't care much about NBC 26. So them spending money would be totally unrealistic. People will watch Larry, but not much else.

Poll

In light of Time Warner's new "modem lease fee" for Road Runner, will you buy your own modem?:

New Members

kelcal2k1's picture
kelcal2k1
Appleton
GEOPTION57's picture
GEOPTION57
KAUKAUNA
chipdalemc's picture
chipdalemc
Wittenberg, WI
unreal2k5's picture
unreal2k5
Appleton
UWFox Theatre's picture
UWFox Theatre
Menasha
rando77's picture
rando77
Fond du Lac
rebel241973's picture
rebel241973
portage
Meno's picture
Meno
Menominee, MI
TVfan1987's picture
TVfan1987
Green Bay, Wisconsin
rdhjr98's picture
rdhjr98
Neenah